Parts for edge mac bridge saw how to#
Parts for edge mac bridge saw software#
Parts for edge mac bridge saw windows#

Parts for edge mac bridge saw windows#

If it was a no-brain installer for windows it would preserve the existing OS while updating the grub menu.lst to allow you to boot windows. I later solved this problem by giving windows its own drive and PHYSICALLY unplugging any drive I wish to be untouched by the pretentious windows installer.

Parts for edge mac bridge saw how to#

Hardly a no-brain install when you have to go onto the internet to learn how to create a rescue disk that can be used to mount your root partition to run update-grub to get the bootloader back. Last time I tried to install windows ALONGSIDE an already instaled linux operating system it decided to NUKE my existing bootloader leaving me with no ability to boot linux nor any way to roll it back. What planet are you on? Most people wanting to try linux will be having to try and install it for a dual boot installation alongside an existing windows install. For all the great advances that have been made in the last few years it's still not the no-brain install that Windows is for the vast majority of users)' '(and no, this still won't usher in the era of desktop Linux. People did not know this when they invested significant money in building competing browsers. People did not agree to this when they bought Windows. Microsoft are retroactively changing it, after people have bought it, so you're forced to use the MS web browser. People built competitors to all the built-in apps. But you could always customize it and choose what apps you want to use, including replacing all the built-in apps with better competitors. the Explorer file manager, Calculator, Internet Explorer, the Start Menu / Taskbar). Microsoft provided some default apps to get you started, which ranged from low-quality but works for the basics (e.g.

Parts for edge mac bridge saw software#

Microsoft Windows used to be a general-purpose OS that let you install and run whatever software you want, and customize how you want. If you build apps to run on Apple iOS products you know this and chose to build the app anyway. If you buy Apple iOS products you know this and chose it, so it should be no surprise that it is a walled garden. Apple iOS has always been a walled garden. > funnily enough people have no problem giving Apple a pass for doing exactly this same shit throughout iOSĪpple iOS is a walled garden. For all the great advances that have been made in the last few years it's still not the no-brain install that Windows is for the vast majority of users) yes it sucks MS are doing this, but if we're going to get outraged there let's make sure Apple also feel which way the wind no, this still won't usher in the era of desktop Linux.

at the end of the day I don't care about what browser I actually use, but I want the one that keeps my history etc in sync and has a UI that doesn't suck. I use full-fat Outlook (because the Win10 inbox mail app is a half-arsed mess) and will be seriously grumpy if they start hijacking links there to point to Edge instead of my default Brave. And because of this Microsoft starts to think it's okay to inch back to forcing users into using their second rate apps because Apple has got away with that behaviour for so long.

Funnily enough people have no problem giving Apple a pass for doing exactly this same shit throughout iOS - you can't choose your mapping app, your browser, your mail app, your calendar etc.